the price of convenience – Plastics
Filed Under: city living, environment, plastics on November 16, 2009
The phrase, “Spaceman economy vs Cowboy economy” was used in one of my life science courses… many years ago.
In it’s simplest interpretation, a Spaceman economy is based on convenience– and a throw away society. In contrast, those who live a Cowboy economy, understand the cycles of nature – with crop rotation and it’s inherent notions of recycling, healing and new growth.
Humanity is currently undertaking urbanization on an unprecedented scale, and a Cowboy economy in the city, although not impossible, is a bit more difficult.
We all live in more complex and busy lives.
Have a look around.
Many of the new business models that are thriving, are based on a throw away / convenience notion. Consumerism. And along with this rise in convenience is the rise in the effort to package and make available to the masses, items made of or protected by plastic.
As a blog attempting to explore “living green in an urban setting”, the use of plastics is something I will explore. It is a fascinating subject, as both sides of the plastic packaging divide have strong arguments.
Heck, one can devote an entire blog to the notion of plastics, it’s problems, perception, misunderstandings, etc. What is of interest, is one of the many industry responses to plastics as we know it today – Bioplastics. And even within this term, “bio-plastics” there are many forms, schools of thought, future potential … and yes, the phoneys out there, with their Greenwashing.
.
mounds of discarded plastic bags… but disposable garbage problems are not unique to plastics
What is disconcerting is the current debate on the evils of plastics, and the associated plastic bags debate… BAN the PLASTIC BAG… seems to be a familiar battle cry. Especially from our elected leaders.
But the cry seems to come from those who carry plastic based cell phones, wearing plastic eyeglasses, driving or sitting in high content plastic based transportation forms, communicating on their plastic mice, keyboards and plastic based computer housing systems, and munching healthy snacks contained in plastic enclosures.
Hypocrisy?
Perhaps. I just think that people should do their homework before they go about pointing fingers.
Here’s an article from MetroNews:
April 25-26, 2009
by Stephanie Urbanowicz
Kermit the Frog had it right when he said, “It’s not easy being green.”
We all want to do the right thing for the environment, but it’s very confusing. We are constantly bombarded with new “green” choices — compact fluorescent light bulbs, organic food, bio-fuels and even greener packaging.
But are these choices really more environmentally-friendly?
It’s trickier than it seems. Close examination shows the choices aren’t clear, and what we think is green might actually be worse for the environment. For example, organic foods are perceived to offer a better environmental choice — but only if they aren’t transported thousands of miles.
Fluorescent light bulbs last longer and consume less energy — but they are loaded with toxic mercury lethal to humans and the environment.
Bio-fuels may create less air pollution — but they may divert valuable, needed land from food production, straining the world’s food supply.
Even the much-promoted reusable grocery bag is a case study in how tricky green can be.
Cotton reusable bags are very fossil fuel intensive and soil depleting. According to the Pesticide Action Network of North America, 25 per cent of the world’s insecticides are used in the production of cotton.
Perhaps that’s why most reusable grocery bags in Canada are made from heavy plastic.
Another not-so-green aspect of reusable bags is that most are made in China and shipped across the Pacific when they could be made here in Canada.
Surprisingly, the muchvilified plastic shopping bag may be much better for the environment than people think. Why? First, it’s usually made in Canada, eliminating carbon-producing long-distance transport. Second, it’s made from clean natural gas produced right here in Canada.
And without plastic bags what will we do with our household garbage? Using your 99-cent reusable bag as a bin liner isn’t going to happen, so now you’ll buy kitchen catchers containing almost double the amount of plastic of the traditional bags you used to get for free. This will cost you more and result in more plastic being consumed.
Also, what happens to that reusable bag when it tears or the handle breaks? Contrary to what we’ve been told, reusable grocery bags cannot be recycled in Canada.
Ironically, traditional plastic shopping bags are easily recycled across Ontario in blue bin programs and at participating retailers with a real environmental ethos. These bags are recyclable, and they’re remanufactured in Ontario into useful new products like drainage pipes and garden edging — creating much needed manufacturing jobs.
Even Kermit the Frog would be pleased with this green choice.
Stefanie Urbanowicz is a bio-chemical engineer with a degree from the University of Western Ontario. She is registered with the PEO and has worked in the auto parts sector for the past eight years.
